Information on Result #479747

There is no (109, 129, 3234516)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 35 370623 632058 116734 849506 730823 034453 146912 307842 467286 215577 > 3129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 130, 3234516)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction