Information on Result #479756

There is no (48, 130, 225)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 110 306407 893240 448308 598177 646858 616132 429561 633944 982285 512739 > 3130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (48, 131, 225)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction