Information on Result #479757

There is no (50, 130, 243)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 108 909075 890855 796553 029501 080126 111958 856172 543437 186052 973745 > 3130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 131, 243)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction