Information on Result #479757
There is no (50, 130, 243)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 108 909075 890855 796553 029501 080126 111958 856172 543437 186052 973745 > 3130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (50, 131, 243)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |