Information on Result #479758
There is no (52, 130, 264)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 117 698677 942467 091178 877420 477055 701521 929522 700483 604777 218913 > 3130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (52, 131, 264)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |