Information on Result #479764

There is no (64, 130, 468)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 112 514527 056426 634729 856265 079179 737015 108758 245730 270714 137001 > 3130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 131, 468)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction