Information on Result #479798

There is no (51, 131, 251)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 338 255743 748645 725630 039566 127202 180219 924279 432505 437940 161841 > 3131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 132, 251)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction