Information on Result #479799

There is no (53, 131, 272)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 329 810060 690695 845865 378301 377793 926288 385994 293467 020665 827521 > 3131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 132, 272)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction