Information on Result #479838

There is no (50, 132, 240)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1090 610492 354029 037482 118171 982049 004297 098085 761509 866273 724641 > 3132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 133, 240)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction