Information on Result #479839

There is no (52, 132, 259)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1017 877977 763631 847529 835743 920062 328246 324936 044182 878662 413233 > 3132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 133, 259)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction