Information on Result #479861

There is no (96, 132, 11895)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 955 529919 757445 327681 409089 317411 808317 184974 061016 268185 050445 > 3132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 133, 11895)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction