Information on Result #479878

There is no (49, 133, 229)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3012 787058 047654 628325 945759 683973 576846 780980 385591 034643 075889 > 3133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 134, 229)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction