Information on Result #479880

There is no (53, 133, 267)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2972 822163 802061 002794 720333 888475 853976 986402 128849 354904 662065 > 3133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 134, 267)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction