Information on Result #479881

There is no (55, 133, 290)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3044 134777 083993 218546 431385 632335 699643 167034 533874 195839 005865 > 3133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (55, 134, 290)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction