Information on Result #479887

There is no (67, 133, 520)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2965 962850 738619 110871 859587 188827 817302 336282 980968 284634 222097 > 3133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 134, 520)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction