Information on Result #479898

There is no (89, 133, 3448)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2868 216741 373116 299687 779684 918639 941114 479311 943030 700307 303377 > 3133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 134, 3448)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction