Information on Result #479919

There is no (48, 134, 220)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9887 475553 914173 061073 902333 154526 733132 982790 366654 599646 003025 > 3134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (48, 135, 220)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction