Information on Result #479928

There is no (66, 134, 482)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9024 520426 103635 441560 374035 175615 004937 004615 006651 271191 278485 > 3134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 135, 482)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction