Information on Result #479961

There is no (49, 135, 226)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26628 878185 200793 541137 584017 668580 859816 459511 287403 460269 681089 > 3135

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 136, 226)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction