Information on Result #479963

There is no (53, 135, 263)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 28951 569963 133913 797301 301759 883065 302246 685997 181743 479083 081151 > 3135

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 136, 263)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction