Information on Result #479969

There is no (65, 135, 448)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25876 499247 424324 637383 179339 641245 434384 128595 902400 369803 169537 > 3135

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 136, 448)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction