Information on Result #480005

There is no (52, 136, 251)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 84911 086037 410441 277683 300347 973881 585180 443816 967874 546436 184069 > 3136

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 137, 251)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction