Information on Result #480054

There is no (65, 137, 433)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 237676 261947 554270 132412 686835 058903 619633 921431 020410 111444 372049 > 3137

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 138, 433)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction