Information on Result #480098

There is no (66, 138, 448)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 742821 367550 517070 636381 662675 419811 766083 056989 307236 774017 151489 > 3138

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 139, 448)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction