Information on Result #480314

There is no (65, 143, 396)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 181 555487 085817 412508 793648 448909 535425 341028 491869 636454 923756 008273 > 3143

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 144, 396)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction