Information on Result #480326

There is no (89, 143, 1812)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 169 955323 364684 173223 381604 129650 237605 515221 865498 490498 004419 781297 > 3143

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 144, 1812)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction