Information on Result #480329

There is no (95, 143, 3390)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 169 280207 640188 729689 075940 771286 933542 831208 989396 084909 665859 702769 > 3143

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 144, 3390)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction