Information on Result #480723

There is no (56, 152, 260)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 784964 917217 903061 018309 769252 166365 589912 806973 384537 219202 683140 008321 > 3152

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 153, 260)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction