Information on Result #481007

There is no (52, 158, 224)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2589 710657 504888 491428 162334 863527 334011 843149 149354 625030 315556 325000 304065 > 3158

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 159, 224)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction