Information on Result #481104

There is no (52, 160, 223)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 25429 731405 862929 471341 699944 064306 497448 632056 165259 320603 195237 146684 118613 > 3160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 161, 223)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction