Information on Result #481105

There is no (54, 160, 236)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26097 297946 529204 882559 511368 006626 115373 881547 027867 556078 993722 976838 061497 > 3160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 161, 236)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction