Information on Result #481107
There is no (58, 160, 265)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 24543 550232 285144 562927 346616 404170 275920 259504 834221 458823 834969 713533 330619 > 3160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (58, 161, 265)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |