Information on Result #481154

There is no (53, 161, 228)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 68748 142704 361002 883627 501696 740254 202370 174953 827461 319759 239113 162775 482649 > 3161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 162, 228)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction