Information on Result #481156

There is no (57, 161, 256)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 73931 052519 525629 337282 462460 341491 517355 358722 917446 330443 050008 621543 290881 > 3161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 162, 256)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction