Information on Result #481157

There is no (59, 161, 272)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 76779 258884 151635 322369 779942 340145 035595 311122 601558 772074 717361 273386 787905 > 3161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 162, 272)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction