Information on Result #481158
There is no (61, 161, 289)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 73244 567361 728789 925849 530958 986050 774109 505640 013689 624764 446393 291160 367881 > 3161
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (61, 162, 289)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |