Information on Result #481162

There is no (69, 161, 378)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 70893 553977 116383 174168 950941 184837 425967 605586 298110 005685 939603 416733 242141 > 3161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 162, 378)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction