Information on Result #481186

There is no (117, 161, 14023)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 65617 875763 460255 255520 877509 173421 557200 643013 946413 012192 562292 067374 708517 > 3161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (117, 162, 14023)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction