Information on Result #481203

There is no (52, 162, 221)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 199393 981059 039012 790496 713268 279046 814739 605139 566692 303358 946078 604449 277947 > 3162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 163, 221)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction