Information on Result #481205

There is no (56, 162, 247)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 198903 213154 698696 837296 229875 852907 966373 922746 939006 333804 121474 819183 948871 > 3162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 163, 247)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction