Information on Result #481226

There is no (98, 162, 1634)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 199600 082835 353115 109808 145701 770303 474241 552690 560473 584649 724072 953883 828545 > 3162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 163, 1634)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction