Information on Result #481230

There is no (106, 162, 3227)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 196742 210296 063441 744289 277104 130374 730877 834161 065600 718499 958081 869126 258601 > 3162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 163, 3227)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction