Information on Result #481254
There is no (53, 163, 227)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 674748 369972 319538 374401 566529 338305 591259 560604 858691 328773 215064 356178 505763 > 3163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (53, 164, 227)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |