Information on Result #481254

There is no (53, 163, 227)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 674748 369972 319538 374401 566529 338305 591259 560604 858691 328773 215064 356178 505763 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 164, 227)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction