Information on Result #481255
There is no (55, 163, 240)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 694728 109216 096939 060819 018298 317696 285658 223923 116723 421865 834945 058154 313121 > 3163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (55, 164, 240)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |