Information on Result #481255

There is no (55, 163, 240)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 694728 109216 096939 060819 018298 317696 285658 223923 116723 421865 834945 058154 313121 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (55, 164, 240)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction