Information on Result #481257

There is no (59, 163, 269)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 665315 953937 050030 563908 944821 068158 967384 630467 761506 863657 396693 304768 944593 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 164, 269)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction