Information on Result #481258

There is no (61, 163, 285)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 597386 814336 722108 071472 330466 460642 155298 705715 315669 156361 152274 558927 242571 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 164, 285)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction