Information on Result #481272

There is no (89, 163, 891)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 602295 330208 819823 575124 536478 874456 106893 382011 012599 391891 822787 959071 081839 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 164, 891)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction