Information on Result #481273

There is no (91, 163, 998)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 594507 516080 173000 817133 172972 889096 642407 815919 050291 078681 190288 249936 715337 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 164, 998)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction