Information on Result #481292

There is no (129, 163, 134777)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 589947 707901 407685 907412 484084 074451 185299 026632 511805 621113 559948 153228 235187 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 164, 134777)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction