Information on Result #481306
There is no (56, 164, 246)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 128449 665289 168784 465166 823345 005173 648527 963391 899232 492701 570260 580713 384661 > 3164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (56, 165, 246)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |