Information on Result #481306

There is no (56, 164, 246)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 128449 665289 168784 465166 823345 005173 648527 963391 899232 492701 570260 580713 384661 > 3164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 165, 246)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction