Information on Result #481338
There is no (120, 164, 16292)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 769797 653737 561469 694563 521489 563373 168332 029092 168968 179368 814471 716463 517593 > 3164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (120, 165, 16292)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |